Skip to main content
Zilligent Labs

Services

We focus on software that has real workflows, real data, and real consequences. If your problem is mostly a landing page, we’ll say so — and point you to a better fit.

Show amounts in:

INR uses an indicative rate (~83 INR/USD) for orientation only; quotes are confirmed in writing.

Ballpark: we often work from about $5,000 upward, scaling with complexity; many full product scopes land around $15,000–$75,000 fixed for agreed work — integrations, compliance, and risk move the number. Full pricing FAQ →

Technologies and practices we use: React, Next.js, Node.js, Spring Boot, Python, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, GraphQL, Redis, REST APIs, CI/CD, Microservices, AI / ML integration, LLM-powered features

ReactNext.jsNode.jsSpring BootPythonTypeScriptPostgreSQLAWSDockerKubernetesTerraformGraphQLRedisREST APIsCI/CDMicroservicesAI / ML integrationLLM-powered featuresReactNext.jsNode.jsSpring BootPythonTypeScriptPostgreSQLAWSDockerKubernetesTerraformGraphQLRedisREST APIsCI/CDMicroservicesAI / ML integrationLLM-powered features

Every project includes

  • Structured discovery & written scope
  • Private staging environment
  • Weekly status updates during active build
  • Test-first discipline on core logic
  • Quality checks before each release
  • Handoff package: code, docs, tests

Stacks & practices we use

Familiar, boring-in-a-good-way technology choices — optimized for reliability, hiring, and long maintenance.

Frontend

  • • React
  • • Next.js
  • • TypeScript
  • • Responsive & accessible UI

Backend & APIs

  • • Node.js
  • • Python
  • • Java / Spring Boot
  • • REST
  • • GraphQL
  • • Microservices

Data

  • • PostgreSQL
  • • Redis
  • • Migrations
  • • Performance basics

Infrastructure

  • • AWS
  • • Docker
  • • Kubernetes
  • • Terraform
  • • CI/CD

AI / ML

  • • LLM-powered features
  • • Guardrails & evaluation mindset
  • • Integration with your product workflows

Web applications

Who it’s for

Teams replacing spreadsheets, email chains, or brittle internal tools.

Typical timeline

Typical engagement: a few weeks to a couple of months — depends on workflows and integrations.

  • Role-based access and audit-friendly patterns
  • Integrations with email, payments, CRMs, or internal APIs
  • Staging previews for real feedback — not screenshots
Discuss web applications

Mobile apps

Who it’s for

Founders who need iOS/Android alongside a dependable API.

Typical timeline

Often parallelized with backend work; timeline driven by store requirements and scope.

  • Cross-platform or native-aligned architecture — chosen for your constraints
  • Push, auth, and offline-aware flows where needed
  • Test plans for device matrix and release hygiene
Discuss mobile apps

AI-powered products

Who it’s for

Teams adding LLM features without gambling on prompt-only prototypes.

Typical timeline

Depends on risk: retrieval, eval hooks, and data handling add real engineering time (on purpose).

  • Production-minded prompting, tooling, and monitoring hooks
  • Safety, PII, and retention considered up front — not after launch
  • Human-in-the-loop workflows when stakes are high
Discuss ai-powered products

APIs & backend systems

Who it’s for

Products that need clean contracts between services, partners, or legacy systems.

Typical timeline

Scoped by number of integrations, data migrations, and operational requirements.

  • Versioned APIs, idempotency, and error models that clients can rely on
  • Observability and deployment practices suitable for small teams
  • Documentation your future engineers will thank you for
Discuss apis & backend systems

SaaS platforms

Who it’s for

Founders launching multi-tenant software with real billing and permissions.

Typical timeline

Usually multi-phase; we’ll propose a sensible MVP slice first.

  • Tenancy, roles, and admin workflows
  • Billing integration patterns (per your provider choices)
  • Upgrade paths that don’t require a rewrite in 90 days
Discuss saas platforms

MVP → production

Who it’s for

You have traction signals and need something maintainable — not a disposable demo.

Typical timeline

We’ll align on the smallest production-worthy slice, then iterate with change control.

  • Strip scope to what validates the business — without painting yourself into a corner
  • Tests on the critical paths that must not break
  • Handoff that a future hire or agency can pick up
Discuss mvp → production

Not sure which bucket you’re in?

That’s what the consultation is for — we’ll help you triage and propose a sane first milestone.

Book a consultation